Structured analysis for complex energy decisions.

Turn energy and infrastructure decisions into structured analysis — expectations, assumptions, risks, and confirmation signals in minutes.

Designed for energy planners, infrastructure teams, and local authorities evaluating real projects.

Example Analysis

A Bristol City Leap programme-level decision — the kind this tool is designed to structure.

"Should Bristol City Leap prioritise expanding the city heat network or accelerating building electrification in the next investment phase?"

Strategic feasibility Carbon reduction Capital allocation Bristol City Leap

Expected outcomes: Heat network expansion offers long infrastructure lifespan for dense urban heat demand. Electrification via heat pumps may deliver faster reductions in lower-density housing but depends on grid capacity.

Key assumption: Connection uptake among commercial and residential properties reaches ≥65% for heat network economics to be viable.

Confirmation signal: ≥50% building connection commitments secured before capital commitment.

Analyse a decision

Describe your decision below. The more context you provide, the more specific the analysis.

What decision are you evaluating?

Decision stage

Primary objective

Primary constraint

Project context — briefly describe the programme or policy context

Organisation (optional)

Time horizon (optional)